Dominikus Scherkl had written: > Has anybody meanwhile contributed a proposal > regarding the missing genealogical symbols ? > (after Otto Stolz's message from 24.02.2003 I wondered this > was not proposed long ago - or was it and was rejected for > some reason?!?).
So do I -- however, I am not in the position to author a formal proposition: I am not able to provide a font, and I do not have the time for a research beyond the evidence I have already given.
Rick McGowan wrote:
Do you have any documentation on these?
The two scans under http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/li.png http://www.rz.uni-konstanz.de/Antivirus/tests/re.png are from the authoritative (until July 1996) book on German orthography: Duden "Rechtschreibung der deutschen Sprache und der Fremdwörter" / hrsg. von d. Dudenred. auf d. Grundlage d. amtl. Rechtschreibregeln. [Red.Bearb.: Werner Scholze- Stubenrecht unter Mitw. von Dieter Berger ...]. - 19., neu bearb. u. erw. Aufl. ISBN: 3-411-20900-3.
Best wishes, Otto Stolz
