On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:10:44 -0700, Andrew C. West wrote: > I've never really understood normalization, but it seems to me that > normalising "bcuig" <0F56, 0F45, 0F74, 0F72, 0F42> to "bciug" <0F56, > 0F45, 0F72, 0F74, 0F42> is wrong as "bciug" could conceivably be a > shorthand abbreviation for a wcompletely different word with a gigu > [i] on the first syllable and a shabkyu [u] on the second syllable.
Err, as in this particular case one vowel sign is above and the other one is below the stack - i.e. they don't interact spatially - you cannot really distinguish them. ;) SY, Uwe -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Zu Grunde kommen http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
