On 04/08/2003 17:36, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
Peter Kirk asked:
A similar issue which is not Hebrew related would be a (mythical)
requirement to display a diacritic like 0315, 031B or 0322 in isolation.
It would not always be appropriate to use a space or NBSP as a base
character as this would indent the glyph from the beginning of a line in
a way which might not be wanted. What would be the recommended encoding
if one wanted to display one of these characters with no leading white
space?
If you just want to display a nonspacing mark in isolation, then
you apply it to a SPACE (or NO-BREAK SPACE) and typically let the
metrics of the font then handle how the mark is going to appear
"floating in space" as it were.
If you want to display some character like U+0315 COMBINING COMMA
ABOVE RIGHT *and* you want to do it is isolation *and* you want
it to occur at the beginning of a line *and* you want there to
be no display width between the margin and the left edge of the
display bits of the glyph, then you have stepped over the boundaries
of what is reasonable to expect plain text to convey. Feel free
to make use of the higher-level capabilities of your word
processor or page layout program to individually adjust the
positioning of particular glyphs displayed in particular fonts.
Thank you. Understood.
More generally, however, when the issue of the relative
position of a non-spacing mark with respect to its base
glyph is what is in question, the standard recommends
(and uses) the convention of displaying the non-spacing
mark on a dotted circle as a base. This makes it clear that
we are talking about the non-spacing mark itself, but also
makes clear the positional differences between left, centered,
and right forms, for example.
If I want to do this, should I explicitly encode a dotted circle, or
should I encode nothing and expect the font to generate the dotted
circle, as it often does?
--Ken
--
Peter Kirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
