----- Message d'origine ----- 
De: "Markus Scherer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> It looks to me like Christopher is not after an analysis of what standards
could somehow be squeezed
> to use Unicode charsets, but rather a list of standards that _specify_
(actively, not potentially)
> Unicode/10646.
>
> The obvious ones are of course
> HTML (at least since 4.01:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/charset.html#h-5.1)
> XML
> ECMAScript
>
> I do not have a complete list.

Another one : ISO 14651 (collation), I believe.

Ken Whistler (or Alain Labonté) can confirm (or deny) this.

P. A.





Reply via email to