But if you lowercased that, surely you'd get <j, combining dot above>. How should that be rendered?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> A dotted capital J can already be encoded as <J, combining dot above>.
> Hence, a separate precomposed such character will not be added.
>
>   /kent k
>
> > Well, in the event that Unicode ever does add  DOTTED J to go with
> > DOTLESS J, I sincerely hope that it does not follow the example of
> > DOTTED I and DOTLESS I.
>




Reply via email to