"Raymond Mercier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem of the size of Unihan has nothing at all to do with the cost of > storage, and everything to do with the functioning of programs that might > open and read it. It's a data file stored as a text file to be simple; it's not designed with reading as its primary goal. less and vim work just fine here. > I wish the people who designed this file would accept the need for a more > structured and sophisticated approach. Why not, for example, have a basic > html file, with html-links to the various sections ? Because it's a data file, and it's easier to process without all that HTML junk to discard. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
- Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algorithm Ernest Cline
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algo... Raymond Mercier
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algo... John Jenkins
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting ... Raymond Mercier
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sort... John Cowan
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary ... Philippe Verdy
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sort... Doug Ewell
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algo... D. Starner
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algo... jameskass
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting ... John Jenkins
- RE: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algo... Mike Ayers
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting algo... Andrew C. West
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sorting ... Edward H. Trager
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sort... Tom Emerson
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary sort... Benjamin Peterson
- Re: Unihan.txt and the four dictionary ... Edward H. Trager