There is a different committee mailing list than the one for the UTC. However, for the public [EMAIL PROTECTED] list it didn't seem worth having separate public list yet. (After all, much of the material on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is general globalization discussion -- and often even pretty far off that topic :-)
However, what we agreed is that we would monitor the situation and if it looked like there was enough traffic to warrent making a separate public list, we would. Mark __________________________________ http://www.macchiato.com â ààààààààààààààààààààà â ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Frank Yung-Fong Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Asmus Freytag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sat, 2004 Apr 24 18:29 Subject: Re: Standardize TimeZone ID > If the officers believw that rather than the UTC that a new committee is > needed to "govern" the repository, then it stands to reason that the Unicode > List is the wrong place for locales.... a separate list for discussions > related to that standard is the most sensible approach. > > MichKa [MS] > NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Development > Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Asmus Freytag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Frank Yung-Fong Tang" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 6:07 PM > Subject: Re: Standardize TimeZone ID > > > > At 05:04 PM 4/24/2004, Mark Davis quoted a message by Frank: > > >I know this is a little bit off-topic for Unicode, just like the one > > >about locale. Maybe I should move this to w3c i18n mailling list > > > > Now that the common locale data repository is hosted by The Unicode > > Consortium, it may no longer be as off-topic as you think.... > > > > A./ > > > > > > > > > > >
