> How do you distinguish those scripts that are rejected as 'ciphers' > of other scripts from those which you want to encode, if 1:1 correspondence > is not sufficient grounds for unification but visual dissimilarity > is grounds for disunification?
As far as I can follow Michaels arguments he says the following: Disunification for scipts with 1:1 correspondence requires - having distinct glyphs - beeing a relevant script (e.g. historical important, because other scipts do also derive from it, not only the one with the 1:1 correspondence). The later isn't true especialy for Klingon, but it's also not true for e.g. fraktur, because fraktur is the derived script, not latin. -- Dominikus Scherkl
