From: "Peter Constable" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I would probably leave the value at 220. That is what all of the Hebrew > vowel points should have been, IMO. Though getting one right doesn't > make a huge difference -- people are still going to be using CGJ to > preserve particular sequences in the cases this will most likely be > needed.
I note that the definition of combining sequences in TUS 4.0.1 was updated to include ZWJ and ZWNJ, but still not CGJ, in the middle or at end of a combining sequence. This is shown in the list of changes. Has there been an agreement made to accept CGJ too? Or is this question in the decision pipe for a later vote during some next UTC meeting?
