Doug Ewell scripsit:
> John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth dot com> wrote:
> 
> > Consequently, random pages that happen to be in non-Unicode charsets
> > are getting mis-served and mis-displayed.  The site will probably
> > revert to having no default as a result, which is a great pity.
> 
> I'm sure this is a dumb question, but why would there be any pages in
> non-Unicode charsets on the Unicode Web site?

History, I guess.  I've pointed out the existence of "recode", but Her
Divine Effulgency seems unwilling to alter historical documents even if
just at the byte level.

-- 
Knowledge studies others / Wisdom is self-known;      John Cowan
Muscle masters brothers / Self-mastery is bone;       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content need never borrow / Ambition wanders blind;   www.ccil.org/~cowan
Vitality cleaves to the marrow / Leaving death behind.    --Tao 33 (Bynner)

Reply via email to