Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote: > The situation is even more confused in that some Unicode characters, > e.g. U+0152 LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE OE, are called LIGATUREs in their > character names but are unambiguously single Unicode characters (e.g. > they have no decomposition even for compatibility). (These are in > addition to the characters named LIGATURE in the Alphabetic > Presentation Forms block, which mostly have compatibility > decompositions.)
The last thing you want to worry about is the correlation between whether a character has the word LIGATURE in its name and whether it is actually a ligature. That way lies madness. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
