This page on the French version of wikipedia notes that Polytonic Greek used in the 3rd century B.C. alternate letters to denote the initial spirits ("pneuma das�" for the "hard" spirit, and "pneuma ps�lon" for the "soft" spirit), rather than the modern 9-shaped combining accents.

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diacritiques_de_l%27alphabet_grec

(Note: to see all letters in Internet Explorer, you have to configure it to use the "Arial Unicode MS" font from Office or the free "Code2000" font, and to indicate to Internet Explorer, in the Accessibility options, to ignore the fonts styles selected on web pages: the default font selected in the Wikipedia CSS stylesheet for Internet Explorer forces the "Arial" font which does not contain glyphs for all these characters; apparently Wikipedia has problems to find a reliable way to configure their stylesheets to work with various versions of Windows or IE).

These letters were noted initially by Aristophane with a variant of the historic "H" letter that noted the /h/ sound (but was later borrowed when it became unused to note the sound /�/ with eta), by cutting the "H" (eta) glyph in two half-parts (and sometimes found with L-shaped glyphs without the lower part of the vertical). These historic phonemes subsist today only as diacritics for modern polytonic greek, but this is not the case of historic texts where they may still be pronounced /h/ on initial vowels or diphtongues or rho.

The same page gives an encoding for the latest non-combining form where these spirits are represented by upper tacks (before they became diacritics). My question is: can these historic half-eta letters be unified with these tacks, or are they distinct letters?

Are there variants encoded for these historic half-eta letters, to mean that they should not be shown with the upper tack glyphs but with the historic half-eta glyphs?




Reply via email to