John Cowan wrote, > In what, breadth of coverage or aesthetics? The GNU Unifont has very > wide coverage though it is a bitmap font; James Kass's CODE 2000 and CODE > 2001 probably have the widest coverage of any font, though it costs US$5 > to use them.
Code2001 is freeware. > Both of them IMHO are a tad on the ugly side. There's always room for improvement. Best regards, James Kass
