On 1/13/2012 10:50 AM, John H. Jenkins wrote:
Asmus Freytag 於 2012年1月13日 上午11:01 寫道:
Nobody has written a formal proposal yet.
When that is done, then one of the questions that needs to be decided
in initial triage is whether these are elements of the han script
proper or iconic symbols that happen to be derived from han
characters. (The proposal may suggest a particular resolution of this
issue). If, with all facts on the table, the consensus is that they
are "regular" han characters, then their further evaluation starts
with tracking them under TR#45 and potentially taking them to IRG for
possible consideration in extension F.
It's been suggested that one way of handling them would be as encoded
hanzi. That's one criterion for going into UTR #45 as it is part of
the paper trail of the UTC's decision process.
And the UTC could always refuse to put them into UTR #45. My job is
to make the recommendation.
In either case, somebody other than me (that is, somebody who wants
them added to Unicode) needs to write a document/proposal to the UTC
justifying that and giving the options for encoding.
D'accord.
A./
=====
John H. Jenkins
井作恆
𐐖𐐱𐑌 𐐐. 𐐖𐐩𐑍𐐿𐐮𐑌𐑆
jenk...@apple.com <mailto:jenk...@apple.com>