Den 2013-09-10 19:01, skrev "Asmus Freytag" <asm...@ix.netcom.com>:
> Good question, Jean-François.
>
> I seem to recall that typographers may make a distinction between
> "black-letter" and "fraktur" forms, but even if they, the differences
> are typographical, not essential. For the purpose of *character*
> encoding, one would need to make a very strong rationale for disunifying
> these.
>
> This rationale is absent in document WG2 N3907 that requests these
> characters.
>
> Therefore, it seems these two additions should not have been made.
I would agree, and in addition,
AB3E;LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER O WITH STROKE;Ll;0;L;;;;;N;;;;;
should have a compatibility decomposition to
00F8;LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE;Ll
Cmp.
1D52C;MATHEMATICAL FRAKTUR SMALL O;Ll;0;L;<font> 006F;;;;N;;;;;
/Kent K
