On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Richard Wordingham <richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Much as I don't like their uninvited use, it is possible to pass them > and other undesirables through most applications by a slight bit of > recoding at the application's boundaries. Using 99 = (3 + 32 + 64) PUA > characters, one can ape UTF-16 surrogates and encode:
What's the point? If we can use the PUA, then we don't need the noncharacters; we can just use the PUA directly. If we have to play around with remapping them, they're pointless; they're no easier to use in that case then ESC or '\' or PUA characters. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
