On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorp...@cs.tut.fi> wrote: > The change is logical in the sense that bold face is a > more original notation and double-struck letters as characters imitate the > imitation of boldface letters when writing by hand (with a pen or piece of > chalk).
On the other hand, bold face is a minor variation on normal types. Double-struck letters are more clearly distinct, which is probably why they moved from the chalkboard to printing in the first place. I don't see much advantage of πππππ over ββββ€β, especially when confusability with NCRZQ comes into play. -- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
