Le jeudi, 5 juin 2014 à 18:24, Jeff Senn a écrit :
> If your implication is that there should be no canonicalization (the string > from the source is used as a sequence of characters only directly mapped to a > symbol), then I predict sticky problems in the future. Note that this is actually the case in the XML specification, processors are not required to perform normalisation for matching tag names (see ‘match' in this section [1] and this comment [2] of the annotated XML specification), I suspect this is rarely a problem in practice since XML vocabularies tend to stick to ASCII identifiers (and so should programmers in general IMHO). Daniel [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-terminology [2] http://www.xml.com/axml/notes/StringMatch.html _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode@unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
