> My proposal on the other hand - if implemented right - introduces some really intuitive looking and easy to input characters, <snip>
Easier than latin1, a layout one could find on [almost] every keyboard? Good luck. Konstantin 2015-02-09 2:54 GMT+04:00 Pierpaolo Bernardi <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Alfred Zett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That was exactly my thought, so I figured it couldn't harm to have these > > >> a Tab is exactly what you described. > > > > No. It's only half of what I described. > > It's still a typographical character that implies whitespace and may > appear > > everywhere in the text. > > How would your proposed character be displayed as plain text? > > >>> - A codepoint for string literal quotes, that would spare one the > >>> escaping. > >> > >> How would this work exactly? > > > > Imagine you type " in your IDE, but because your IDE does know that this > new > > programming language requires this special character as literal token, it > > replaces it with a special looking quotation mark. > > Unicode is a standard for plain text. If you require a special IDE > for your programming language then why use plain text at all? > _______________________________________________ > Unicode mailing list > [email protected] > http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode >
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
