Unless there is a value in documenting the value of the numerator and
denominator, in which case this should be prominently explained in the
documentation. Or is that written down somewhere already?
A./
On 3/28/2015 1:05 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
In the 8.0 Beta files, some numerical values are not reduced to their
lowest forms. Is there a compelling reason that
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R;;;;6/12;N;;;;;
is not written as
109FB;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION SIX TWELFTHS;No;0;R;;;;1/2;N;;;;;
given that there is also a
109BD;MEROITIC CURSIVE FRACTION ONE HALF;No;0;R;;;;1/2;N;;;;;
Aren't the numeric values of U+109FB and U+109BD the same?
Existing software that looks at the numeric values of characters is
written expecting that rational numbers will have been reduced to
their lowest form.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
