Sorry to be a pain. I mentioned I looked up the minutes and couldn't find anything apropos.
Could someone explain the rational behind 134-C2 and how it might apply to the rainbow flag proposal ? On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 at 20:04 Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > More: > > >> [...] the UTC does not wish to entertain further proposals for > >> encoding of symbol characters for flags, whether national, state, > >> regional, international, or otherwise. References to UTC Minutes: > >> [134-C2], January 28, 2013. > > This is also why U+1F3C1 CHEQUERED FLAG doesn't set a precedent for > encoding additional flags as single characters: it was also introduced > in Unicode 6.0, more than two years earlier. > > -- > Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸 > >
