Thanks Doug. On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 at 17:45 Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote:
> > In other, other words, something like "[flag]LGBT" should be a > non-starter. > Followed until this bit. Why would it be a non-starter? > If you are still suggesting a single character, this thread doesn't > affect that suggestion at all. > I don't know enough about how the Consortium functions to understand my best course of action. Looking for advisement on (a) what is most likely to pass UTC muster, and (b) what is most likely to result in rainbow flag emojis being available widely in the near future.