On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > From http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2015/15169-montenegro-cyrillic.pdf, > "Addition of two letters from Montenegrin language, CYRILLIC script": > > > 9. Can any of the proposed characters be encoded using a composed > > character sequence of either existing characters or other proposed > > characters? > > No > > Saying it doesn't make it so: >
Right, although I doubt that the proposers monitor this mailing list... In case an interested party is listening: If sr-ME needs different locale data than sr, then one could contribute such data to CLDR <http://cldr.unicode.org/>. See the current state: http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/trunk/common/main/sr_Cyrl_ME.xml markus