On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:37:21 -0700 Markus Scherer <markus....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote: > > > From http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2015/15169-montenegro-cyrillic.pdf, > > "Addition of two letters from Montenegrin language, CYRILLIC > > script": > > > > > 9. Can any of the proposed characters be encoded using a composed > > > character sequence of either existing characters or other proposed > > > characters? > > > No > > > > Saying it doesn't make it so: Is there a requirement to answer those questions truthfully? > Right, although I doubt that the proposers monitor this mailing > list... > > In case an interested party is listening: If sr-ME needs different > locale data than sr, then one could contribute such data to CLDR > <http://cldr.unicode.org/>. > See the current state: > http://unicode.org/cldr/trac/browser/trunk/common/main/sr_Cyrl_ME.xml Presumably http://cldr.unicode.org/index/survey-tool/accounts is the most relevant page for someone with credibility. However, as Montenegro has an army and a navy, you have the wrong locale. It's still waiting for a language code. See the language family panels at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Herzegovinian_dialect and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montenegrin_language for the extreme Balkanisation. But in short, yes we need the extra Cyrillic letters с́ and з́ and Latin letters ś and ź for the exemplar characters in sr_Cyrl_ME and sr_Latn_ME (or should that be sr_ME?). I can't work out the status of Montenegrin Latin {sj} and {zj}. Richard.