On 31 Jul 2015 at 15:32, William_J_G Overington wrote: > A request not to post and support for a request not to post without stating > any reason whatsoever is, in my opinion, unfair.
Thank you; however I believe that Mr West's and Mr Freytag's reactions were triggered also by my hasty complaints about Microsoft. Fundamentally I didn't respect a mailing list rule which is to always respond to a particular request or statement, to stick with the thread. I'm sorry to have uselessly vented; nevertheless I'm thinking about some precise replies which I'll send soon. All the best, Marcel Schneider > Message du 31/07/15 15:32 > De : "William_J_G Overington" > A : [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > Copie à : [email protected] > Objet : Re: Emoji characters for food allergens > > >> I'll try to respond to all, > > > Please don't. > > What Marcel wrote was as follows: > > quote > > I'll try to respond to all, having not much time outside my main concerns, > sorry. > > end quote > > When I first read that, and indeed when I read it again after reading > Andrew's comment, I read it as Marcel wishing that he could reply > individually to each of several posts in this thread, but as he was busy, he > would reply in just the one post, the post he was then writing, to various > points. > > Thus there was no need to ask him not to do so, as he had already done it in > that same post. > > As someone else has decided to post supporting the request, I reply that I > enjoy reading Marcel's posts and that I hope that he continues. > > These are important issues for end users of encoding standards and for > consumers generally as they are about food allergens and the labelling of > food packaging. > > A request not to post and support for a request not to post without stating > any reason whatsoever is, in my opinion, unfair. > > William Overington > > 31 July 2015 > > > > > >
