On Sun, 4 Oct 2015 16:57:15 -0700 "Asmus Freytag (t)" <asmus-...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On 10/4/2015 4:14 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote: > respect to what to erase or undo. >>> For sequences that belong to a given language, you can pick the >>> behavior that makes most sense in them, but for lone surrogates, by >>> definition you are dealing with broken text that doesn't follow any >>> conventions. >> Who's 'you'? Customisation is frequently not available. In fact, I >> don't recall seeing it on offer. > The UI developer. > And there's nothing Unicode can do about lack of customizability. Actually, there is. I believe suggestions and recommendations in the technical reports are quite influential. Richard.