On 2015/10/05 04:30, Asmus Freytag (t) wrote:
On 10/4/2015 6:02 AM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
In the absence of a specific tailoring, is the combination of a lone
surrogate and a combining mark a user-perceived character? Does a lone
surrogate constitute a user-perceived character?
In an editing interface, a lone surrogate should be a user perceived character,
as otherwise you won't be able to manually delete it. Markus suggests that it be
treated like an unassigned code point.
In an editing tool (of which an editing interface is a part of), a lone
surrogate should just be removed! Apparently, that's what happens in
Richard's case, but only eventually.
Regards, Martin.
