Isn't it better to use some sort of COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE? 2016/03/10 8:30 "Andrew West" <andrewcw...@gmail.com>:
> On 10 March 2016 at 07:00, Martin J. Dürst <due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > > > > because these numbers can go up to the 200s, it doesn't make sense to > > register them all as characters (one would need over 500!). > > I don't get why that would make no sense. We already have CIRCLED > NUMBER 1 through 50, and NEGATIVE CIRCLED NUMBER 1 through 20, and > these characters are widely used (in East Asian contexts, at least) > for representing note numbers in text. In my opinion it would be > eminently sensible to extend both series up to 999, which would cover > the needs of Go notation and as well as note numbering for the vast > majority of users. > > Andrew > >
