Rebecca Bettencourt wrote, > I can put together a unified chart, with mappings to Unicode where > they exist. In fact I think I'll do that. :)
I hope you do. That would be a good starting point. > I'm all willing to help put together a proposal for encoding missing > block element characters, but I would need other people to a) gather > evidence of use in plain text and b) write up the proposal in Unicode's > formal language since I've never proposed characters to Unicode before. Even the most prolific of our proposers had to start someplace... > As time goes on, “not in widespread use” will become a flimsier > and flimsier argument against inclusion... Agreed. As arguments go, that one was never very robust. Best regards, James Kass