L2/17-168 says: "For UTF-8, recommend evaluating maximal subsequences based on the original structural definition of UTF-8, without ever restricting trail bytes to less than 80..BF. For example: <C0 AF> is a single maximal subsequence because C0 was originally a lead byte for two-byte sequences."
When was it ever true that C0 was a valid lead byte? And what does that have to do with (not) restricting trail bytes? -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
