> Until TUS 3.1, it was legal for UTF-8 parsers to treat the sequence <C0 AF> > as U+002F.
Sort of, maybe. It was not legal for them to generate it though. So you could kind of infer that it was not a legal sequence. -Shawn
> Until TUS 3.1, it was legal for UTF-8 parsers to treat the sequence <C0 AF> > as U+002F.
Sort of, maybe. It was not legal for them to generate it though. So you could kind of infer that it was not a legal sequence. -Shawn