Hello,

Here's a list of frequently used Han characters for Hakka and Minnan, Chinese 
dialects.

It contains several EXT-B characters that you can test: 

http://bobbytung.github.io/TaigiHakkaIdeograph/ 
<http://bobbytung.github.io/TaigiHakkaIdeograph/>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18CUbZ7tsvZ4QbUj3xcfYi9EGqsft4T37WtUMX9v2STQ/pubhtml
 
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18CUbZ7tsvZ4QbUj3xcfYi9EGqsft4T37WtUMX9v2STQ/pubhtml>


Bobby Tung
W3C invited expert
Editor of CLREQ



> via Unicode <[email protected]> 於 2017年11月14日 下午1:45 寫道:
> 
> Dear Peter,
> 
> since the Chinese characters below are meaningless in Chinese using them 
> should not be a first choice, as they are meaningless, so gibberish, just not 
> complete gibberish.
> 
> Plane 2 has a fair number of older Chinese characters, so someone with a 
> knowledge of ancient Chinese might well be able make something meaningful. 
> Run a competition in China would be one way to get suggestions, spotting a 
> good suggestion is easier than making one.
> 
> Plane 2 has Cantonese, Vietnamese and Zhuang characters. The number of 
> Cantonese characters is small, so making phrases using only them would be 
> difficult. Both Vietnamese and Zhuang have a much larger number of characters 
> so much easier to make something meaningful.
> 
> The following Zhuang proverb, or saying
> 
> 𮤯𫭴𭣀𭒹𣐡𮤯󶒘𩜋𭸘𭡘
> 
> "Plant sweet potatoes in the field, and raise pigs in the sty."[lit: house, 
> as the bottom floor of tradional house used for livestock and people live in 
> floor above.]
> 
> However third and eighth characters are not the most common used.
> 
> Regards
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 14.11.2017 06:38, Peter Constable via Unicode wrote:
>> I discussed this with one of my Chinese co-workers, and we came up
>> with the following:
>> 
>> “𠀀𠀁𠀂𠀃𠀄
>> 𦬣𦬤𦬥𦬦𦬧
>> 𦩒𦩓𦩔𦩕𦩖
>> 𨣫𨣬𨣭𨣮𨣯”
>> 
>> Factors in the choice of characters were:
>> - different radicals
>> - for a given radical, have a sequence of consecutive characters so
>> people get the idea it's not a sentence but just a sequence of
>> characters with related meanings
>> - radical groups increase in complexity
>> 
>> 
>> It's not a sentence that can be read, but there's an obvious pattern,
>> so it's also not completely gibberish.
>> 
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Kass [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 2:29 PM
>> To: Peter Constable <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Unicode list <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Plane-2-only string
>> 
>> Peter Constable wrote,
>> 
>>> We don't want to add BMP characters to the ExtB fonts.
>> 
>> So the sample text would lack punctuation.  Given that the
>> Supplementary Ideographic Plane is composed of rare and historical
>> characters from multiple sources, I suspect that the short answer to
>> Peter's original question is:  "No".
> 

Reply via email to