On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 22:34:12 -0800 Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode <[email protected]> wrote:
> The ZWJ Virama sequence is already provided for by the combination of > GB9 & GB9c. But not the ZWNJ. If we want to handle that, it would > mean the addition of something like: > > GB9d: × (ZWNJ ViramaExtend* Virama) I don't think we need ViramaExtend* here. The seqeunce should be followed by a base consonant, so there's no way for another mark to sneak in. Incidentally, I think ViramaExtend would be better named as NSExtend, with 'NS' for 'non-starter'. Richard.
