We'll probably never know which factors influenced the decision, but apparently some kind of message got through.
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... John W Kennedy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Julian Bradfield via Unicode
- In the mean time,... Denis Jacquerye via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new... Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charact... Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charact... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new cha... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charact... Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new cha... Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new... Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a... Garth Wallace via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019,... Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
