Philippe, it was a jest. (Good one, too!) On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote: > 2018-02-21 5:01 GMT+01:00 Anshuman Pandey via Unicode <[email protected]>: >> >> > The good news is that the thread title question is moot. >> >> Yes, now let’s please return to discussing emoji. > > > Or NOT !!! This is NOT at all the same topic
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Garth Wallace via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Robert Wheelock via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Robert Wheelock via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... John W Kennedy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... David Starner via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new charac... Asmus Freytag via Unicode

