Tim Partridge wrote: > Perhaps the CLDR work the Consortium does is being referenced. That is > by language on this list > http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/32/supplemental/locale_coverage.html#ee > By the time it gets to the 100th entry the Modern percentage has "room > for improvement".
I think that is a measurement of locale coverage -- whether the collation tables and translations of "a.m." and "p.m." and "a week ago Thursday" are correct and verified -- not character coverage. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
