On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 04:25:53 -0500, Elsebeth Flarup via Unicode wrote: > > For a number of reasons I think translating the standard is a really bad idea. > […] > > There are other reasons to not do this.
I assume that the reasons you are thinking of, are congruent with those that Ken already explained in detail in: http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2018-m03/0025.html And I think with Ken that the idea in itself isnʼt bad as such, but that it is not feasible any longer. Everybody (supposedly) knows that the Core Spec has really been translated, published in a print edition, scanned into Google Books, and is still for sale: https://www.amazon.fr/Unicode-5-0-pratique-Patrick-Andries/dp/2100511408/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1206989878&sr=8-1 https://books.google.fr/books? id=GgbWZNTRncsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Andries+Patrick&hl=fr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwis59Cwp93ZAhUF6RQKHZ1GBlIQ6AEIKjAA#v=onepage&q =Andries%20Patrick&f=false OK, the version number was only half the actual one. Best regards, Marcel
