The UTC didn't want to burden the doc registry with all the emoji proposals.
Mark On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Asmus Freytag via Unicode < [email protected]> wrote: > On 4/19/2018 5:32 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode wrote: > > > imagine I discover that someone has already proposed the emoji that I > am interested in > > In some cases we've have contacted people to see if they want to engage > with other proposers. But to handle larger numbers we'd need a simple, > light-weight way to let people know, while maintaining people's privacy > when they want it. > > > I would tend to think that actual proposals are a matter of public record. > Emoji should not be handled differently than other proposals for character > encoding in that regard. > > Why should there be an assumption that these are "proposals in private" in > this case? > > A./ >
