On 4/19/2018 9:36 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
The UTC didn't want to burden the doc registry with all the emoji
proposals.
The question of whether the registry should be divided is independent on
whether proposals are public or private in nature.
Proposals in private have no place in the context of public standard.
A./
Mark
//
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Asmus Freytag via Unicode
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 4/19/2018 5:32 AM, Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode wrote:
> imagine I discover that someone has already proposed the emoji
that I am interested in
In some cases we've have contacted people to see if they want to
engage with other proposers. But to handle larger numbers we'd
need a simple, light-weight way to let people know, while
maintaining people's privacy when they want it.
I would tend to think that actual proposals are a matter of public
record. Emoji should not be handled differently than other
proposals for character encoding in that regard.
Why should there be an assumption that these are "proposals in
private" in this case?
A./
