It would be great if mutual synchronization were considered to be of benefit. Some of us in SC2 are not happy that the Unicode Consortium has published characters which are still under Technical ballot. And this did not happen only once.
> On 17 May 2018, at 23:26, Peter Constable via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> > wrote: > > Hence, from an ISO perspective, ISO 10646 is the only standard for which > on-going synchronization with Unicode is needed or relevant.
