|
On 7/16/2018 10:04 PM, Janusz S. Bień
via Unicode wrote:
I understand there is no sufficient demand for the Unicode Consortium maintaining a supplementary non-ideographic variation database. Hence for the time being a kind of Private Use variation database seems to be the only solution - am I right? The question comes down to resources, among
other things. As well as to whether A strawman proposal could identify these
issues and some ways that they might be A./ |
- Variation Sequences (and L2-11/059) Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (and L2-11... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (and L... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (a... William_J_G Overington via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (a... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequence... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Variation Seq... Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
- Re: Variation Seq... William_J_G Overington via Unicode
- Re: Variation... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Variation... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- old Polish an... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (and L2-11... William_J_G Overington via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (and L... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Variation Sequences (a... William_J_G Overington via Unicode
- L2-11/059 and L2/13‐153 (was: Vari... Janusz S. Bień via Unicode

