> On Jul 23, 2019, at 12:26 AM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode > <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:42:37 -0700 > Anshuman Pandey via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote: > >> As I pointed out in L2/11-144, the “Magar Akkha” script is an >> appropriation of Brahmi, renamed to link it to the primordialist >> daydreams of an ethno-linguistic community in Nepal. I have never >> seen actual usage of the script by Magars. If things have changed >> since 2011, I would very much welcome such information. Otherwise, >> the so-called “Magar Akkha” is not suitable for encoding. The Brahmi >> encoding that we have should suffice. > > How would mere usage qualify it as a separate script?
I apologize for using the wrong conjunction. Instead of “otherwise” I should have written “nevertheless”. All my best, Anshu
