Agree. By the way, it is common practice to use multiple nbsp in a row to create a larger span. In my opinion, it is wrong to replace fixed width spaces with non-breaking spaces. Quote from Microsoft Typography Character design standards: «The no-break space is not the same character as the figure space. The figure space is not a character defined in most computer system's current code pages. In some fonts this character's width has been defined as equal to the figure width. This is an incorrect usage of the character no-break space.»
- NBSP supposed to stretch, right? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Fwd: NBSP supposed to stretch, right? QSJN 4 UKR via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, righ... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stretch, ... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to stret... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed to ... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: NB... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: NBSP supposed... James Kass via Unicode
- Aw: Re: NBSP supposed to s... Jörg Knappen
- Re: Re: NBSP supposed... Shriramana Sharma via Unicode