> I was also wondering about common subexpression elimination. So is the > optimizer in Icon's icont but not part of Unicon's icont? Is that waht > you are saying Clint?
Umm, no. No significant difference between Icon's icont and Unicon's icont, they are the same program, and no, they don't implement any standard optimizations that I am aware of. They should do constant folding, common subexpression elimination, and various other common optimizations. These things were not research, so they were not done. Someday maybe I will find a student to do some of them for a project. Or maybe a volunteer will step in and work on icont. What I was saying was maybe if we rewrote icont (a very dusty old C program) in Unicon, it would make it significantly easier to write optimizations. Clint ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
