On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 19:20, Steve Wampler wrote: > > I've done enough testing to convince myself that there is something > unusual about Kostas' set up. Either different compilers, or different > compile time options, or both - or *something*. For example, here's > another variant of his test (which does more iterations to increase > the running time in an attempt to get above the noise). [Note this is > a slightly slower machine than the one I ran tests with earlier, but is > still a Linux RedHat 9 computer.] As you see from these results, not > only are the times comparable, but the Unicon version is actually > a bit faster! (The results were similar with three other runs, as > well.)
Kostas, Some other things to check (besides compilers and options) are the sizes of the variable Unicon/Icon memory regions - perhaps your version of Icon was built with much larger memory regions and so, as Clint suggests, is getting away with fewer GCs. -Steve -- Steve Wampler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
