I think C must remain a strong backend for Unicon. Of course,
embedded applications and apps that are otherwise resource-constrained
will benefit from this one the most. Optimisations in this area are
certainly welcome...

  However, it terms of usefulness to a more broad range of people,
having a Unicon.Net implementation will guarantee full compatibility
with other languages supported under .Net, as well as improved Windos
interface, since that OS is slowly shifting towards .Net-only upper
layers. Clearly, we don't want having multiple VMs that can not
interoperate (JVM, iconx, .Net).

  Besides, I don't think there are any open-source projects porting
Perl/Python/Ruby onto .Net;-) Having (un)Icon there first will promote
it better!


On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:03:22PM -0500, Kostas Oikonomou wrote:
> I want to put my vote in on this issue:  I consider a good interface to
> C much more important than interfacing with .net.
> 
> While Unicon is very competitive "feature-wise" with languages such as 
> Python
> and Perl, it is significantly behind in terms of inter-operability with C, 
> which these
> languages enjoy.
> 
> I also feel that .net is (hopefully!) somewhat ephemeral, while the same 
> cannot be
> said of C.
> 
>                               Kostas
> 
> 
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:42:58 -0700, Clint Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:]
> >
> >>    Do you think it worthwhile to aim for .Net compatibility, as well as
> >>  native C?  I think usage of un(Icon) can
> >>  improve considerably if it can interoperate with .Net (this will also
> >>  save us from programming in C#;-), certainly in Windos environment...
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to