I want to put my vote in on this issue: I consider a good interface to C much more important than interfacing with .net.
While Unicon is very competitive "feature-wise" with languages such as Python and Perl, it is significantly behind in terms of inter-operability with C, which these languages enjoy.
I also feel that .net is (hopefully!) somewhat ephemeral, while the same cannot be said of C.
Kostas
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:42:58 -0700, Clint Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:]
Do you think it worthwhile to aim for .Net compatibility, as well as native C? I think usage of un(Icon) can improve considerably if it can interoperate with .Net (this will also save us from programming in C#;-), certainly in Windos environment...
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Unicon-group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
