>
> As an aside, we are currently finishing up arrays as a special case of
> the list type in Unicon, with more compact C-compatible
> representation.  It reduces the memory cost of big lists-of-reals by
> even more than sticking reals into descriptors, and is complementary
> to this idea.
>


  In the case of real arrays the gain is even more than less accesses and
memory saving; it means one less "real block" creation for each real array
access.

Jafar




>
> Clint
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Gamey <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I was probably having a flashback to SPITBOL/370 :)
> >
> > ... where reals like integers could be kept inside the variable
> descriptor.
> > Of course that meant really weird 7 byte reals. Sometimes the underlying
> > semantics are so similar they get blurred.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
> _______________________________________________
> Unicon-group mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group
>



-- 
"Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error"
[The Holy Qur'an 2:256]

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"    Dr. King
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Unicon-group mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unicon-group

Reply via email to