In message <4a7dc46b.4050...@msgid.tls.msk.ru>, Michael Tokarev writes: > Erez Zadok wrote: [...] > Aha. So here goes my (and not only my) "mystic" EACCESS problem which > I reported about a year or more ago. At that time I did some more testing > trying to narrow it down but failed to reproduce it reliable and said some > "more recent" kernel fixed the issue. But it in fact did not and the prob > happened again and again.. I just tried this patch on a "testcase" which > caused it to happen with 100% reliability, and it does not happen any more. > > Thank you very much! Peace!
You're welcome. > By the way, how about different versions of nfs? are them all using the same > magic number? Ys, AFAIK. But nfs4 behaves differently (i.e., it handles readonly exports correctly, as if it were a local f/s). So the code in this patch should only trigger on nfs2/3. > /mjt Erez. _______________________________________________ unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
