Neil I. Lifson wrote:
>" But, I think it is crazy to IMPOSE limits on people who
>bought their homes with no expectation of limits beyond those that
>existed at purchase." [Katherine Costello]
>
>All zoning and L&I regulations change over time, no matter when you buy a
>property. The building code is updated every 2 yrs, if I recall correctly.
> (It might be every 3 or 4 yrs).
>
This is different. the codes you described-- L&I, police, fire, etc.,--
are derived from real-world needs and material requirements. We
understand that houses should be made to _not_ burn down, and their
stairways should not collapse, for example. And these are issues that
are normally debated openly by technical experts. And, most importantly,
the fact of city building codes is nearly _universal_ in home ownership.
We know that if you buy a home, it's got to be kept up to code.
The issues facing an Historic District are _not_ derived from such
real-world requirements. They are based solely on aesthetics and a
perceived need to preserve architectural styles. Also, these are
standards that are _not_ universal. Not every house in Philly has to
deal with the PHC. It is a _special_ set of regulations.
Which brings me to an interesting point. In this week's _University City
Review_, I offered a proposal to the advocates of the Historic District.
Before demanding HD for the entire neighborood, why not voluntarily
place _your own home_ under PHC jurisdiction? I'm sure the UCHS will be
happy to furnish the historical references. You'd be protecting your
home, doing a service to the neighborhood, and if you can inspire others
do volunteer their own homes, it'd set a nice example. And as more and
more people sign on for the "obvious benefits," more and more of the
neighborhood would be protected.
So, can we count on you to put your property where your mouth is?
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
